GB Packers vs. Dallas Cowboys

Home Forums Non Archery Discussion GB Packers vs. Dallas Cowboys

This topic contains 100 replies, has 24 contributors, and was last updated by merve_01 merve_01 7 years ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 101 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 23, 2007 at 5:12 am #516109 Back to Top REPORT
    jeff-k-in-il
    Jeff K in IL

    Age: 26
    Joined: 11/1/2005
    Det. put up 26 on them today….Dallas will put up 40 on them easy…..Dallas wins by 17

    There is a difference between giving up, and playing hard and having them score. How many times was detroit down in the Packs territory and failed to score?

    Now lets revert back to the Skins/Dallas game, the Skins put up 24 points was it?

    Detroit has a better offense than some may give them credit for, and the Pack just plain thought they had it in the bag in the 4th quarter, like Favre said, they have some things to work out.

    But I don’t see Dallas leaving them anywhere close the the figure you put up… :^O :^O

    Turkey drugged ya Ricky…

    Oh and Merve, don’t be too excited, lets see Dallas played ANOTHER under 500 team today, those Jets are real good, and just because they beat the Steelers means squat, because the Steelers are not all that good either!

    Skins, Giants, and Patriots are the only decent teams they have played… Dallas that is!

    Give credit where its due, the Pack are a dominant team, they can play all phases of the game, they just have to do it for 4 quarters… ;)

    Another thing, why the heck is the game on the NFL network? ](*,)

    November 23, 2007 at 5:38 am #516110 Back to Top REPORT
    bigeves34
    BigEves34

    Joined: 8/29/2005
    It sure would be nice if I could even watch the stupid Game….. The NFL network sucks… :thumbdown :thumbdown

    I hear ya man… that’s really dumb of the NFL to allow that. But, money talks… ](*,) :whistle
    However, I just happen to get the NFL Network, so I’ll be watching it anyway… anyone want to come over and watch w/ me? :whistle :D :thumbup

    November 23, 2007 at 1:25 pm #516111 Back to Top REPORT
    merve_01
    merve_01

    Age: 31
    Joined: 1/13/2007
    Location: Indiana

    Det. put up 26 on them today….Dallas will put up 40 on them easy…..Dallas wins by 17

    There is a difference between giving up, and playing hard and having them score. How many times was detroit down in the Packs territory and failed to score?

    Now lets revert back to the Skins/Dallas game, the Skins put up 24 points was it?

    Detroit has a better offense than some may give them credit for, and the Pack just plain thought they had it in the bag in the 4th quarter, like Favre said, they have some things to work out.

    But I don’t see Dallas leaving them anywhere close the the figure you put up… :^O :^O

    Turkey drugged ya Ricky…

    Oh and Merve, don’t be too excited, lets see Dallas played ANOTHER under 500 team today, those Jets are real good, and just because they beat the Steelers means squat, because the Steelers are not all that good either!

    Skins, Giants, and Patriots are the only decent teams they have played… Dallas that is!

    Give credit where its due, the Pack are a dominant team, they can play all phases of the game, they just have to do it for 4 quarters… ;)

    Another thing, why the heck is the game on the NFL network? ](*,)[/quote:322rrcem]

    The Greenbay fans make excuses for why the game was closer than it was…. Greenbay playing soft… turnovers what have you… fact remains Detroit put up 26 plus points…. and still kicked FOUR field goals in first half… if only HALF of those were touchdowns… which you HAVE to believe Dallas could do EASILY than this game is entirely different and the Packers lose…. Not to mention that Dallas has the better Defense between Dallas and Detroit… Demarcus Ware, Chris Canty, and Greg Ellis will eat Farve… and when Farve is getting punched in the mouth he is liable to make stupid plays. ;)
    Dallas’ game last week- was atroscious on defense… no way around it… however they were again without Henry and he is supposed to be back next week for the Packers… Now I hear you lost at least 1 if not 2 of the Packers defensive line one with a broken arm one with a leg injury… and the fact that Greg Jennings hurt his knee (who knows serious or not- but he hurt it twice) and the fact that Charles Woodson left with a toe injury- probably turf toe (which is an injury that put the best cb to ever play out of the game Prime Time Sanders ;) none of these bode well for the Packers….

    Only question is HOW many of the Dallas haters voted against Dallas on this poll just because it was Dallas- and not because they believe the Packers will actually win?

    PS play the entire game… if I can’t complain about teams putting up yards- points against my Cowboys team when they are winning by 3 scores than you can’t about the Packers ;) :^O :^O :^O [=}=]

    November 23, 2007 at 1:29 pm #516112 Back to Top REPORT

    va mountain hunter

    Joined: 11/30/2004
    Make no mistake about it though Dallas is the better team…

    Ha ha. Wishful thinking. Position by position, it’s tough to say one team has an advantage, but an easier case could be made for the Packers.

    Name a spot where allas has a distinct advantage over Green Bay now that this Grant kid looks to be for real.

    November 23, 2007 at 1:36 pm #516113 Back to Top REPORT
    merve_01
    merve_01

    Age: 31
    Joined: 1/13/2007
    Location: Indiana

    Make no mistake about it though Dallas is the better team…

    Ha ha. Wishful thinking. Position by position, it’s tough to say one team has an advantage, but an easier case could be made for the Packers.

    Name a spot where allas has a distinct advantage over Green Bay now that this Grant kid looks to be for real.[/quote:2o9jnanb]

    Offensive Line… TIGHT END, WR, Running Back…. (our 2 is better than Grant- no doubt however difference is marginal so I will give this as a wash)…
    Defense:
    Dallas LBs Greenbays Safetys… when healthy Dallas Corners and Dallas Lines
    Kicker position is a wash…. even with Folk missing only 2 kicks (one was a block)
    QB- Greenbay has more experience but I can’t say that Farve is playing any better than Romo… Romo has a lot more tds Farve has more yards- HE ALSO throws 50 times a game Romo doesn’t…. so stats are inflated for Farve… both qbs are liable to make stupid throws… so this position is a wash…
    now factor in the injuries that the Packers sustained last night…. and this only improves Dallas’ chance of dominating next Thursday..

    where exactly were you thinking the Packers are “Better” at?

    November 23, 2007 at 1:41 pm #516114 Back to Top REPORT

    va mountain hunter

    Joined: 11/30/2004

    Offensive Line… TIGHT END, WR[/color:29n6gh27], Running Back…. (our 2 is better than Grant- no doubt however difference is marginal so I will give this as a wash)…
    Defense:
    Dallas LBs[/color:29n6gh27] Greenbays Safetys… when healthy Dallas Corners[/color:29n6gh27] and Dallas Lines
    Kicker position is a wash…. even with Folk missing only 2 kicks (one was a block)
    QB- Greenbay has more experience but I can’t say that Farve is playing any better than Romo… Romo has a lot more tds Farve has more yards- HE ALSO throws 50 times a game Romo doesn’t…. so stats are inflated for Farve… both qbs are liable to make stupid throws… so this position is a wash…
    now factor in the injuries that the Packers sustained last night…. and this only improves Dallas’ chance of dominating next Thursday..

    where exactly were you thinking the Packers are “Better” at?[/quote:29n6gh27]

    Hilarious.

    I think most positions are at or very close to being a wash, with the only noticeable edges being for the Packers at CB and LB- positions perfectly suited to shut down the allas one-big-play-a-quarter offense.

    November 23, 2007 at 1:47 pm #516115 Back to Top REPORT
    merve_01
    merve_01

    Age: 31
    Joined: 1/13/2007
    Location: Indiana

    Offensive Line… TIGHT END, WR[/color:1no1ogyb], Running Back…. (our 2 is better than Grant- no doubt however difference is marginal so I will give this as a wash)…
    Defense:
    Dallas LBs[/color:1no1ogyb] Greenbays Safetys… when healthy Dallas Corners[/color:1no1ogyb] and Dallas Lines
    Kicker position is a wash…. even with Folk missing only 2 kicks (one was a block)
    QB- Greenbay has more experience but I can’t say that Farve is playing any better than Romo… Romo has a lot more tds Farve has more yards- HE ALSO throws 50 times a game Romo doesn’t…. so stats are inflated for Farve… both qbs are liable to make stupid throws… so this position is a wash…
    now factor in the injuries that the Packers sustained last night…. and this only improves Dallas’ chance of dominating next Thursday..

    where exactly were you thinking the Packers are “Better” at?[/quote:1no1ogyb]

    Hilarious.

    I think most positions are at or very close to being a wash, with the only noticeable edges being for the Packers at CB and LB- positions perfectly suited to shut down the allas one-big-play-a-quarter offense.[/quote:1no1ogyb]

    You actually believe any wr on Packers is better than Owens? LOL couple him with Crayton Hurd Austin and a guy called Terry Glenn- Who WILL be back at end of year and is probably their best wr they can only improve… and they actually have a viable te so it helps the wrs…
    Offensive line- the biggest and best in the NFL and is reason for the Cowboys dominance in the second half- don’t see how you think Packers are better there…. I will give you the GB corners- as neither Newman or Henry have played healthy together YET… but they will soon and you will see what happens…
    bottom line… both teams one loss… Dallas’ against the “best team to ever play”- in which Dallas played a GREAT game and were first 2 actually lead the Pats… Romo played the Pats better tahn ANY other qb this year…. and if we use the GB fans logic in that we don’t play 4 quarters the game is actually VERY close…
    As for GB… who did they lose to again? I think Dallas’ smoked that team BEFORE all the injuries…. :p

    November 23, 2007 at 2:14 pm #516116 Back to Top REPORT

    va mountain hunter

    Joined: 11/30/2004

    You actually believe any wr on Packers is better than Owens? LOL

    No, but Driver is no punk. He’s got better hands than T.O. (who doesn’t?), blocks better, etc. T.O. has better big play ability, but there’s not such a disparity there that you can elevate the rest of the allas receiving corps over that of the pack.[/color:1yeo40l1]

    couple him with Crayton Hurd Austin and a guy called Terry Glenn- Who WILL be back at end of year and is probably their best wr they can only improve…

    Not gonna help them this weekend.[/color:1yeo40l1]

    and they actually have a viable te so it helps the wrs…
    Offensive line- the biggest and best in the NFL

    The Pats would like a word with you.[/color:1yeo40l1]

    and is reason for the Cowboys dominance in the second half- don’t see how you think Packers are better there….

    They’re not better, just not worse. Clifton and Tauscher are two of the best in the biz.
    [/color:1yeo40l1]
    I will give you the GB corners- as neither Newman or Henry have played healthy together YET… but they will soon and you will see what happens…
    bottom line… both teams one loss… Dallas’ against the “best team to ever play”- in which Dallas played a GREAT game and were first 2 actually lead the Pats… Romo played the Pats better tahn ANY other qb this year…. and if we use the GB fans logic in that we don’t play 4 quarters the game is actually VERY close…
    As for GB… who did they lose to again? I think Dallas’ smoked that team BEFORE all the injuries…. :p[/quote:1yeo40l1]

    November 23, 2007 at 2:21 pm #516117 Back to Top REPORT
    pabowhunter4life
    PABowhunter4life

    Joined: 3/20/2005
    They’re both due to trip up and lose a game, but if I were laying down money I would have to bet on Dallas [=}=]
    November 23, 2007 at 3:53 pm #516118 Back to Top REPORT
    jeff-k-in-il
    Jeff K in IL

    Age: 26
    Joined: 11/1/2005
    They’re both due to trip up and lose a game, but if I were laying down money I would have to bet on Dallas [=}=]

    Thats why nobody listens to you, because you pcik poorly! :p

    Merve, you have been brainwashed by Jerry Jones… :shock:

    Driver: Great hands, quick, can make big plays, and is hard to tackle; Favre’s go to guy.

    Jennings: Runs good routes, playmaker, has some damn good hands.

    Grant: The kid can run, he is big, but yet fast. Did you see him run over that corner yesterday?

    Jones: The guy makes some outstanding catches, he has some good hands, and looks to be like a great prospect.

    The Packs D-Line has some great players on it, Kampman, and Biamila are fast quick and sack machines. Montgomery can play well for Biamila if he is out. The two inside guys are strong and big time run stoppers. The LB’s consist of AJ Hawk, Barnett, and Poppinga. Hawk hits hard as well as Barnett, and Barnett is one of the quickest LB’s out there. Al Harris and Woodson play aggressive as does the rest of the secondary!

    The Pack me be young, but they have an all around better core of players… Romo is a good QB no doubt, but the experience is lacking, and it will show.. [=}=]

    November 23, 2007 at 3:57 pm #516119 Back to Top REPORT
    jeff-k-in-il
    Jeff K in IL

    Age: 26
    Joined: 11/1/2005

    Det. put up 26 on them today….Dallas will put up 40 on them easy…..Dallas wins by 17

    There is a difference between giving up, and playing hard and having them score. How many times was detroit down in the Packs territory and failed to score?

    Now lets revert back to the Skins/Dallas game, the Skins put up 24 points was it?

    Detroit has a better offense than some may give them credit for, and the Pack just plain thought they had it in the bag in the 4th quarter, like Favre said, they have some things to work out.

    But I don’t see Dallas leaving them anywhere close the the figure you put up… :^O :^O

    Turkey drugged ya Ricky…

    Oh and Merve, don’t be too excited, lets see Dallas played ANOTHER under 500 team today, those Jets are real good, and just because they beat the Steelers means squat, because the Steelers are not all that good either!

    Skins, Giants, and Patriots are the only decent teams they have played… Dallas that is!

    Give credit where its due, the Pack are a dominant team, they can play all phases of the game, they just have to do it for 4 quarters… ;)

    Another thing, why the heck is the game on the NFL network? ](*,)[/quote:3tx9ug18]

    The Greenbay fans make excuses for why the game was closer than it was…. Greenbay playing soft… turnovers what have you… fact remains Detroit put up 26 plus points…. and still kicked FOUR field goals in first half… if only HALF of those were touchdowns… which you HAVE to believe Dallas could do EASILY than this game is entirely different and the Packers lose…. Not to mention that Dallas has the better Defense between Dallas and Detroit… Demarcus Ware, Chris Canty, and Greg Ellis will eat Farve… and when Farve is getting punched in the mouth he is liable to make stupid plays. ;)
    Dallas’ game last week- was atroscious on defense… no way around it… however they were again without Henry and he is supposed to be back next week for the Packers… Now I hear you lost at least 1 if not 2 of the Packers defensive line one with a broken arm one with a leg injury… and the fact that Greg Jennings hurt his knee (who knows serious or not- but he hurt it twice) and the fact that Charles Woodson left with a toe injury- probably turf toe (which is an injury that put the best cb to ever play out of the game Prime Time Sanders ;) none of these bode well for the Packers….

    Only question is HOW many of the Dallas haters voted against Dallas on this poll just because it was Dallas- and not because they believe the Packers will actually win?

    PS play the entire game… if I can’t complain about teams putting up yards- points against my Cowboys team when they are winning by 3 scores than you can’t about the Packers ;) :^O :^O :^O [=}=][/quote:3tx9ug18]

    Whats your excuse for the Bills game and the Redskins game?

    Ya you can talk smack all you want, but your precious team did not do so well against either of these opponents… Defense played great in the Skins game, and Offense played great in the Bills game; don’t ya think Mr. Football Analyst?

    November 23, 2007 at 3:59 pm #516120 Back to Top REPORT
    pabowhunter4life
    PABowhunter4life

    Joined: 3/20/2005

    They’re both due to trip up and lose a game, but if I were laying down money I would have to bet on Dallas [=}=]

    Thats why nobody listens to you, because you pcik poorly! :p [/quote:114cmpxz]

    My bookie begs to differ with you :whistle :whistle :whistle

    November 23, 2007 at 4:01 pm #516121 Back to Top REPORT
    jeff-k-in-il
    Jeff K in IL

    Age: 26
    Joined: 11/1/2005

    They’re both due to trip up and lose a game, but if I were laying down money I would have to bet on Dallas [=}=]

    Thats why nobody listens to you, because you pcik poorly! :p [/quote:yp8gg9mr]

    My bookie begs to differ with you :whistle :whistle :whistle[/quote:yp8gg9mr]

    Bookie… :^O :^O :^O

    November 23, 2007 at 4:43 pm #516122 Back to Top REPORT
    rickym
    RickyM


    Joined: 8/4/2004

    Make no mistake about it though Dallas is the better team…

    Ha ha. Wishful thinking. Position by position, it’s tough to say one team has an advantage, but an easier case could be made for the Packers.

    Name a spot where allas has a distinct advantage over Green Bay now that this Grant kid looks to be for real.[/quote:3chcby7g]
    Offense
    team passing
    Dallas 2,925yards 29td’s 13int
    Green Bay 3,284 yards 22 td’s 8 int.
    adv. green bay

    Team rushing
    Dallas 1,349 yards 11 td’s.
    Green Bay 900 yards 7td’s
    adv. Dallas

    Team Rec.
    Dallas 3,043yards 29td’s 1 fum. these numbers with 60 less receptions.
    Green Bay 3,373yards 22td’s 8 fumbles! :shock:
    adv. Dallas

    Feild Goal
    Dallas 85%
    Green Bay 79%
    adv. Dallas

    Kick returns
    Dallas ranks 25th
    Green Bay18th
    adv. GB

    Team Scoring
    Dallas 2nd
    Green Bay 4th
    adv. Dallas

    Total Team Td’s
    Dallas 2nd
    Green Bay 5th
    adv. Dallas

    Defense

    Total Yards Allowed
    Dallas 7th
    GB 12th
    adv. Dallas

    Passing Def.
    Dallas 21st
    Gb 18th
    adv. GB

    Rushing Def
    Dallas 4th
    GB 12th
    Adv. Dallas

    def. sacks
    dallas 30
    gb 32
    adv. gb

    Interceptions
    dallas 16 with 2 td’s
    gb 12 with 1 td
    adv. dallas

    Adv…..dallas

    November 23, 2007 at 4:46 pm #516123 Back to Top REPORT
    jeff-k-in-il
    Jeff K in IL

    Age: 26
    Joined: 11/1/2005

    Make no mistake about it though Dallas is the better team…

    Ha ha. Wishful thinking. Position by position, it’s tough to say one team has an advantage, but an easier case could be made for the Packers.

    Name a spot where allas has a distinct advantage over Green Bay now that this Grant kid looks to be for real.[/quote:z5s9c4s6]
    Offense
    team passing
    Dallas 2,925yards 29td’s 13int
    Green Bay 3,284 yards 22 td’s 8 int.
    adv. green bay

    Team rushing
    Dallas 1,349 yards 11 td’s.
    Green Bay 900 yards 7td’s
    adv. Dallas

    Team Rec.
    Dallas 3,043yards 29td’s 1 fum. these numbers with 60 less receptions.
    Green Bay 3,373yards 22td’s 8 fumbles! :shock:
    adv. Dallas

    Feild Goal
    Dallas 85%
    Green Bay 79%
    adv. Dallas

    Kick returns
    Dallas ranks 25th
    Green Bay18th
    adv. GB

    Team Scoring
    Dallas 2nd
    Green Bay 4th
    adv. Dallas

    Total Team Td’s
    Dallas 2nd
    Green Bay 5th
    adv. Dallas

    Defense

    Total Yards Allowed
    Dallas 7th
    GB 12th
    adv. Dallas

    Passing Def.
    Dallas 21st
    Gb 18th
    adv. GB

    Rushing Def
    Dallas 4th
    GB 12th
    Adv. Dallas

    def. sacks
    dallas 30
    gb 32
    adv. gb

    Interceptions
    dallas 16 with 2 td’s
    gb 12 with 1 td
    adv. dallas

    Adv…..dallas[/quote:z5s9c4s6]

    Stats are one thing, can review their schedule for me?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 101 total)