I don’t have a problem with garnering information in that manner, during war. But using confessions gained by those methods for judicial prosecution sets a very dangerous precedent.
When a US Soldier is tortured and then executed for what he said under that duress, I am perfectly willing to drop bombs on the perpetrators. We should be smart enough to avoid such pitfalls.
If we can prove he’s guilty, we can prove he’s guilty. But we should go about it within the lines of the laws we have established. Now if you ask me what I think the punishment phase should be, you guys have been light on him.[/quote:2tmclsr6]
Not gonna vote. I know for a fact our system is ignorant. My question is, why there is even a trial for this SOB. Ok so it found that he is not the mastermind of 911, but its proven he is a muslim extremest.
To me…..we should have killed the ******* on sight. I dont care about torture and dont care about letting him suffer alive. Kill him and kill the rest of them. No more politics, no more trials and saves us a bundle.
Since the job wasn’t taken care of when he was found, I don’t think he can get a “fair” trial anywhere……….at least within the US legal system. Could I be impartial……heck no. And I think death is way too easy of a penance for him.
Now what I’d like to see…………
not sure on this, maybe for starters him being on a work crew cleaning all the glass parts in the 911 memorial?……….and his form of protein would depend on if he did a good job or not………if he did, maybe having protein other than pork………..(Assuming we have to give him a balanced diet…….it’s up to him on whether he will eat it or not)
I don’t know………I really can’t think of anything worthy of the crime he commited……or at least had a hand in………….and like I said, death is way too easy for him to deal with it.