It depends what you need them for. Is the long range viewing going to be for detail, or just for looking around? If it is for detail, I would say 10x is a good choice. For outstanding low-light performance, 8×42’s are the best choice.
I’ve been pretty happy with 10×42’s in the past. My next will may be 8×42’s though.
SWAROVSKI 8X30 SLC. PERFECT FOR BOW HUNTING. SMALL, LIGHT, AMAZING LIGHT GATHERING, AND HUGE FIELD OF VIEW. TIP: BUY THE BEST QUALITY GLASS YOU CAN POSSIBLY AFFORD. YOU WONT REGRET IT. LIFETIME WARRANTY. BUY GOOD ONCE, AND NEVER BUY AGAIN.
I have the Nikon 8X42’s for hunting and love them.
And legal for most 3D events. I learned both of these lessons the hard (expensive) way
Get to a store when theyre not too busy, and ask to take them outside. You’ll learn power is not a major advantage, even going from 8-12x. Also, a lesser quality lense is going to give your blurry edges, taking away from the size you pay for.
FWIW, I first got the 10 x 42 EL Swaro … the image was larger, but the resolution was less … more eye fatigue and less clarity. I took them back and exchanged for the 8.5×42 and have been very happy. The image is sharp, so no eye fatigue, and the light gathering is much better.
FWIW, 8.5 mag is the largest allowed by IBO rules.
Still need some help? Give us a shout by submitting a support request! Our customer service staff can help answer any of your questions whether it is concerning our products, our retailers, warranty, or general support.
Independently owned and operated Mathews Retailers communicate not only Mathews product features & benefits but more importantly they represent our Core Values of Integrity, Innovation & Impact. Learn More »